Turing test – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Turing test – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Turing test is a test of a machine‘s ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour. In Turing’s original illustrative example, a human judge engages in a natural language conversation with a human and a machine designed to generate performance indistinguishable from that of a human being. All participants are separated from one another. If the judge cannot reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine is said to have passed the test. The test does not check the ability to give the correct answer; it checks how closely the answer resembles typical human answers. The conversation is limited to a text-only channel such as a computer keyboard and screen so that the result is not dependent on the machine’s ability to render words into audio.[2]

The test was introduced by Alan Turing in his 1950 paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” which opens with the words: “I propose to consider the question, ‘Can machines think?'” Since “thinking” is difficult to define, Turing chooses to “replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.”[3] Turing’s new question is: “Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?”[4] This question, Turing believed, is one that can actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that “machines can think”.[5]

In the years since 1950, the test has proven to be both highly influential and widely criticized, and it is an essential concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence.[1][6]

Human computer – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The term “computer”, in use from the mid 17th century, meant “one who computes”: a person performing mathematical calculations, before electronic computers became commercially available.

The term “computer”, in use from the mid 17th century, meant “one who computes”: a person performing mathematical calculations, before electronic computers became commercially available.

via Human computer – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Writing contracts is like programming | Never Use This Font

Writing contracts feels a little bit like programming.

Writing contracts feels a little bit like programming.

There is an expected syntax and structure, there are certain key words that have special meaning (i.e. functions, keywords), and removing certain clauses make the entire contract invalid (i.e. runtime error). However, contracts are executed over a much longer timeline.

via Writing contracts is like programming | Never Use This Font.

Pixel to Product: A report on Canada’s digital media economy

Pixel to Product is a research study of the Canadian digital media industry. Its purpose is to put real and actionable numbers towards an industry whose size and scope isn’t clearly understood.

via Pixel to Product: A report on Canada’s digital media economy.