Lytros Cinema Light Field Camera Could Make Green Screens Obsolete | Variety

Lytros Cinema Light Field Camera Could Make Green Screens Obsolete | Variety

Lytro first made its name when it introduced consumer-grade photo cameras in 2012. Lytro’s photo cameras made use of light field technology to not just capture the intensity of light for any given photo, but also the direction of individual light rays. The result were data-heavy photo files that could be manipulated after the fact, allowing photographers to change the focus and other key aspects after they had taken the original photo.

Lytro’s Cinema goes far beyond what existing cameras are capable of. The camera captures 755 megapixel RAW video images with a frame rate of up to 300 frames per second and up to 16 stops of dynamic range. Add the ability to capture 3D depth information, and you have a ton of raw data than can then be used to change the focus or the depth of field after the fact, or even transition from one setting to another within a scene. “In light field technology, you can recompute all of this on the fly,” said Rosenthal.

What’s more, the ability to capture depth information for each and every pixel means that live actions scenes captured with such a camera can be easily combined with visual effects. Green screens, for example, could be a thing of the past: Filmmakers can instead just shoot scenes in natural lighting, and then separate the foreground from the background.

“Maleficent” director Robert Stromberg and award-winning visual effects specialist David Stump used that very trick for “Life,” a short film that Lytro company is going to show at NAB later this week to officially introduce its Cinema camera. “Life” was made by Stromberg’s Virtual Reality Company, which at one point shot the film’s actors in a studio parking lot, only to replace the cars with a stunning blue sky in post-production. “We are doing something that simply is not possible with today’s tech,” said Rosenthal.

Lytro is introducing Cinema as an end-to-end solution that includes a server and cloud storage to capture and process all of that raw data on as well as light field plug-ins for existing editing options. The company aims to make production packages starting at $125,000 available later this quarter, and will also offer studios to combine Cinema with its other key project: Last year, Lytro introduced a light field virtual reality camera called Immerge. Rosenthal said that Immerge and Cinema use a lot of shared infrastructure, making it easier for studios to eventually capture assets for both, and use the same sets to produce feature films and virtual reality experiences.

 

Finding Your Soul Mate Online May Be Harder Than the Dating Sites Suggest

Finding Your Soul Mate Online May Be Harder Than the Dating Sites Suggest

The researchers weren’t interested in what the daters discussed, or even whether they seemed to share personality traits, backgrounds, or interests. Instead, they were searching for subtle similarities in how they structured their sentences—specifically, how often they used function words such as it, that, but, about, never, and lots. This synchronicity, known as “language style matching,” or LSM, happens unconsciously. But the researchers found it to be a good predictor of mutual affection: An analysis of conversations involving 80 speed daters showed that couples with high LSM scores were three times as likely as those with low scores to want to see each other again.

It’s not just speech patterns that can encode chemistry. Other studies suggest that when two people unknowingly coordinate nonverbal cues, such as hand gestures, eye gaze, and posture, they’re more apt to like and understand each other. These findings raise a tantalizing question: Could a computer know whom we’re falling for before we do?

Welcome to the vision of Eli Finkel. A professor of psychology and management at Northwestern University and a co-author of the LSM study, Finkel is a prominent critic of popular dating sites such as eHarmony and Chemistry, which claim to possess a formula that can connect you with your soul mate. Finkel’s beef with these sites, he says, isn’t that they “use math to get you dates,” as OKCupid puts it. It’s that they go about it all wrong. As a result, Finkel argues, their matching algorithms likely foretell love no better than chance.

The problem, he explains, is that they rely on information about individuals who have never met—namely, self-reported personality traits and preferences. Decades of relationship research show that romantic success hinges more on how two people interact than on who they are or what they believe they want in a partner. Attraction, scientists tell us, is created and kindled in the glances we exchange, the laughs we share, and the other myriad ways our brains and bodies respond to one another.

Which is why, according to Finkel, we’ll never predict love simply by browsing photographs and curated profiles, or by answering questionnaires. “So the question is: Is there a new way to leverage the Internet to enhance matchmaking, so that when you get face to face with a person, the odds that you’ll be compatible with that person are higher than they would be otherwise?”

About — Graphic Means

About — Graphic Means

It’s been roughly 30 years since the desktop computer revolutionized the way the graphic design industry works. For decades before that, it was the hands of industrious workers, and various ingenious machines and tools that brought type and image together on meticulously prepared paste-up boards, before they were sent to the printer.

The documentary, Graphic Means, which is now in production, will explore graphic design production of the 1950s through the 1990s—from linecaster to photocomposition, and from paste-up to PDF. Support the production of this independent film, by pre-ordering your copy here.

PS: Major props go to Doug Wilson and his team, the makers of Linotype: In Search of the Eighth Wonder of the World. Watching that film clarified so much of what I’d missed in the previous decades of typesetting. And it charmed, and entertained while doing so. If you haven’t watched the film yet—go do that ASAP!

Interviews

Paul Brainerd: Co-founder of Aldus (producers of Pagemaker)

Colin Brignall + Dave Farey: Letraset typeface designers

Lou Brooks: illustrator, curator of The Museum of Forgotten Art Supplies

James Craig: author and educator

Steven Heller: writer, educator, designer

Cece Cutsforth: designer, educator

Tobias Frere-Jones: typeface designer

Ellen Lupton: designer, author, educator

Carolina de Bartolo: designer, writer, educator

Gene Gable: designer, writer, consultant

Ken Garland: designer, author, educator

Malcolm Garrett: designer, educator

Walter Graham: author, paste-up expert

Dan Rhatigan: typeface designer

Frank Romano: design historian, author, educator

Adrian Shaughnessy: designer, writer, publisher

Ian Swift: designer

Joe Erceg: designer

 

 

Happiness to mindfulness, via wellbeing: how publishing trends grow | Books | The Guardian

Happiness to mindfulness, via wellbeing: how publishing trends grow | Books | The Guardian

I’ve written before about my problems with literary decluttering. But who in their right mind would want to keep eight copies of a directory that barely changes from year to year except for the entries that are out of date? Well – sigh! – me. And here’s why. Many volumes ago, I was asked to write an essay on a literary editor’s life for this sturdy compendium of information for people aspiring to a writing career. While extolling the value of making lists, I wrote that it helped to spot the signs of new publishing trends.

My trend-spotting habit dates back to 1999, when it was all commodity books (powered by the success of Mark Kurlansky’s Cod). In 2002, there was a fad for cute micro-histories with titles almost as long as the text – who today remembers Lord Minimus: The Extraordinary Life of Britain’s Smallest Man?

And so it goes. By 2008, it was all about happiness, with a generical range that took in the historical, the scientific and the philosophical: clearly something more interesting was happening than a dozen books with the same word in the title. By 2012, everything was a biography, as the (yet again) updated essay noted: “We’ve had biographies of food, of cities, of an ocean, the Ordnance Survey map and even cancer.”

The point about trend-spotting is that it helps to find a shape in what can seem like one damned book after another. It’s particularly pleasing when, like the happiness boom, it connects different disciplines and appears to be driven by something more significant than simply publishers out to replicate the last big thing. Happiness led to wellbeing, which in turn led to mindfulness. This says something about social neuroses and efforts to analyse, solve and exploit them. With hindsight, it doesn’t seem coincidental that this strand of thinking and publishing coincided with the financial crash of 2007-8.

And hindsight is what those eight volumes of the Writers’ & Artists’ Yearbook give me. They represent a historiography of my reading life, and the points at which it intersected with the wider culture, long after the books involved have been jettisoned.

Watch this space.

In the Future, We Will Photograph Everything and Look at Nothing – The New Yorker

In the Future, We Will Photograph Everything and Look at Nothing – The New Yorker

My guess is that it wants to kill the software, but it doesn’t want the P.R. nightmare that would follow. Remember the outcry over its decision to shut down its tool for R.S.S. feeds, Google Reader? Nik loyalists are even more rabid.

“The definition of photography is changing, too, and becoming more of a language,” the Brooklyn-based artist and professional photographer Joshua Allen Harris told me. “We’re attaching imagery to tweets or text messages, almost like a period at the end of a sentence. It’s enhancing our communication in a whole new way.”

In other words, “the term ‘photographer’ is changing,” he said. As a result, photos are less markers of memories than they are Web-browser bookmarks for our lives.

IBM System/360 at the IRS – 1966 -1967 Computer History Archives – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaRzExHoUl0

Vintage 1966 film excerpt from the IRS showing how an IBM System/360 mainframe system is used in their tax processing data center. About 4 mins long, color and narration.

Nice view of a 1960’s era data center and the System/360 master console. This excerpt focuses on the System/360.

The full version of this film is called “Right on the Button” and is also available on YouTube. (The model numbers of the equipment seem to have been taped over by the IRS film maker, but it is clearly the IBM 360, and its tape, disk and punch card peripherals)

IBM System/360 at the IRS – 1966 -1967 | Computer History Archives