Structuralism – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This approach examines how the elements of language relate to each other in the present, synchronically rather than diachronically.

Structuralism – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

In Ferdinand de Saussure’s Course in General Linguistics (written by Saussure’s colleagues after his death and based on student notes), the analysis focuses not on the use of language (called “parole,” or speech), but rather on the underlying system of language (called “langue”).

 

This approach examines how the elements of language relate to each other in the present, synchronically rather than diachronically. Saussure argued that linguistic signs were composed of two parts, a “signifier” (the “sound pattern” of a word, either in mental projection—as when we silently recite lines from a poem to ourselves—or in actual, physical realization as part of a speech act) and a “signified” (the concept or meaning of the word).

structuralism: art as not autonomous

Structuralists view society and its rules as expressions of deep structures, often binary codes, that express our primary natures.

structuralism: art as not autonomous.

Structuralists view society and its rules as expressions of deep structures, often binary codes, that express our primary natures. A systematic study of such codes is semiotics, which was later hijacked by Poststructuralists as evidence that language alone provides a true reality.

Continue reading “structuralism: art as not autonomous”

Adactio: Journal—The Language of the Web

I’m not invoking the Sapir Whorf hypothesis here, I just wanted to point out how our language can—intentionally or unintentionally—have an effect on our thinking.

When Ethan Marcotte coined the term “responsive web design” he conjured up something special. The technologies existed already: fluid grids, flexible images, and media queries. But Ethan united these techniques under a single banner, and in so doing changed the way we think about web design.

I’m not invoking the Sapir Whorf hypothesis here, I just wanted to point out how our language can—intentionally or unintentionally—have an effect on our thinking.

via Adactio: Journal—The Language of the Web.

Languages and Cultures: Emotional Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (ESWH)

An emotional version of Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests that differences in language emotionalities influence differences among cultures no less than conceptual differences.

An emotional version of Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests that differences in language emotionalities influence differences among cultures no less than conceptual differences.

via Languages and Cultures: Emotional Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (ESWH).

Continue reading “Languages and Cultures: Emotional Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (ESWH)”